Time for the Boeing (777) Izinski Project

Posted on by

For 777-200LR, 777-300, 777-300ER and 747-400 replacement and Airbus A350-1000/A380 counterattack

This IS the Boeing 777 Izinski Super-Upgrade Program

No, it isn’t in tribute of Yu-Gi-Oh! 5Ds character Akiza Izinski (or for more puritans, Aki Izayoi)

And No. It’s not a thing that terrifies James McNerney, who is in those civil wars against IAM 751 and other Unions (like SPEEA), and it’s not a Yellowstone project or a 7-late-7 fiasco, but a revolutionary redesign to the one of the greatest aircraft ever (or the way to save him).

Would be good if Akiza summons “Black Rose Dragon” to attack Boeing HQ in Chicago to give a letter to Jim McNerney and that letter said “You’re fired”, like Donald Trump.

Started by the question: Should Boeing 777 be condemned to obsolescence and destruction by Airbus A350 or should Boeing 777 be renewed to compete against them? I answered “Yes, the second, but not in the way they’re doing“.

Now, REALLY: Differences between current-777 and Izinskis:

1. New upper-deck segment in futuristic materials: Added a double tempered glass, translucent 2nd decker, with translucid interior and material for keep cabin pressure (should be approved by FAA and EASA) (this deck has 1/2 width of 777 – capable to 4-abreast Y or 3 in J) to the top of the Boeing 777, make a outrageous design, which last part of the upper-deck frame (on 3rd and 4th (or 4th and 5th, in case of 777 Izinski-300) doors) is reserved to the Crew Rest Area (which crew rests in long-range flights).

2. Longer length:

777 Izinski-200 – 69.3m (350 passengers at 3 class) – Replaces 77L, 773, bottom 77W and competes against bottom Airbus A350-1000.

777 Izinski-300 – 75.3m (410 passengers at 3 class) – Replaces top 77W and 744 and competes against top Airbus A350-1000 and bottom Airbus A380.

2A: Larger fuselage: The width of fuselage would be increased to the current 5.6m to 5.65m.

3. Larger wingspan: 69.5m with raked wingtips, folding function (CFRP wing) to enter current Code E taxiways and gates, only 350 kg weight penalty compared to 1,200 kg weight penalty as the original 777-200 folding wingtip.

4. Lighter materials: Beside the lightweight glass, would be used Aluminium-Lithium alloys and CFRP in Izinskis fuselage to low the weight of aircraft to 2/3 of the today MTOW for Boeing 777-300ER (estimated to be 351,000 kg).

5. Engines: Beside of General Electric’s GE9X, with 105,000 lbs and advanced technology, Rolls-Royce (with RB3025 (based in venerable Trent 1000 and also in Trent XWB)) and Pratt & Whitney (engine based on PW1000G Geared Turbofan technology) would be welcome to be part of project and present their engine proposals and apply into the Izinskis to cover more markets and airline needs.
The Izinskis will remain as twin-engined aircraft, capable of ETOPS-330, as the 777 ever was.

6. Same gear width: 12m

7. Same appliabilty to standard runways: Despite of being Code F, the Izinskis will remain capable to operate on standard 45m runways as the current 777 ever did.

8. More Range:

777 Izinski-200: 15,300 km

777 Izinski-200L: 18,200 km

777 Izinski-300: 15,600 km

9. New Interiors: The Izinskis hava a complete new interior,  mood light based on the 737 MAX with a mixture of colors and a complete new interior design, making the 787 ones obsolete.

Related articles

Leave a comment